Points: 0
Short novels are dominating awards. Should writers care?
When I was young, I dreamed of being a novelist. Not a writer, not an author, but a novelist. I'm not even sure why the distinction was that important to me, or what I thought the difference was; I just liked the word.
I can't remember when I became aware of the concept of a novella, that size of book that sits between short story and novel, but it would have been around my teenage years I would guess. I'm pretty sure, however, that I was in my forties before I realised that, between the novella and the short story, there was such a thing as a novelette.
There's no consensus on where the boundaries between novel, novella and novelettes sit. The most practical (if not the only practical) application of the idea of a word-count limit is with awards. Most awarding bodies will have some criteria by which your book must be judged to be eligible, and I do get this. If you've spent years writing a 150,000-word behemoth, you might feel piqued to be beaten to that literary prize by a 20-page pamphlet. But outside of judging criteria, why do some writers seem to obsess about this?
Revisiting? Don't forget to sign in!
'Any man who keeps working is not a failure. He may not be a great writer, but if he applies the old-fashioned virtues of hard, constant labor, he'll eventually make some kind of career for himself as writer.'